Grow relevant customer and account value
Relevant customer needs remain unmet, or expansion activity increases transactions without net account contribution.
- Decision
- Which relevant next proposition or action increases net account contribution while meeting a genuine customer need?
- Primary commercial metric
- Incremental account contribution after all additional acquisition, offer, delivery and operating costs.
- Readiness
- Basic
- Agent role
- None by default; novel dynamic research requires its own P10 comparison.
Fit
Evidence identifies a useful complementary product, capacity need, usage opportunity, addressable win-back cause or satisfied referral cohort.
Product fit is weak, supply is constrained, customer benefit is unclear or rewards mainly subsidise existing behaviour.
Why it should work
Basic version
Prepare
Inputs
Audience or customer
Human role
Systems required
Guardrails
How to configure a Play
Copy the Play you need and complete only the relevant parts of T1–T5. Name the people responsible, define the customer group, agree economic and customer limits, and set a review date before starting. An empty decision threshold is not permission to act. Basic, Connected and Advanced describe how the work is configured; Experimental describes its evidence. AI is optional: compare each AI step with a simpler way of doing the same work.
Do the work
Intervention
Workflow
Confirm customer need.
Choose one variant.
Calculate account-wide economics.
Approve eligibility and terms.
Assign treatment/comparator.
Deliver through native tools or human selling.
Assess substitution, retention and contribution.
Decide.
AI role
Automation role
Agent role
Failure modes
- Affinity mistaken for incremental response
- existing demand shifted between products
- referral codes treated as causality.
Measure and decide
Measurement
Primary commercial metric
Leading indicators
Experiment
Guardrails
Learn and progress
Learning
Optional depth
Advanced versionPrerequisites: see Required maturity above.
Validated treatment selection across several products when sufficient outcomes and account interactions can be modelled.
Evidence for this Play2claims reviewed, with confidence ratings, limits and sources.
Claim classifications
Accepted means a principle or mechanism survived critical review, not that it guarantees a return. Accepted with conditions means prerequisites apply. Qualified means the original claim has been narrowed. Advanced needs substantial readiness. Experimental needs a capped comparison. Unresolved means the evidence cannot settle the claim. Rejected means the recommendation is excluded.
High, Medium and Low describe confidence in the stated target, not the chance of a positive ROI. For a Qualified or Rejected historical claim, confidence applies to the decision to narrow or reject it and to the supported limit—not to the original headline. Read the headline and classification together. An accounting identity or design principle is not empirical evidence of a commercial outcome. Follow the linked chapters, Plays and tools to see where each claim applies.