Prevent profitable addressable churn
Customers leave for potentially fixable reasons, while blanket offers subsidise customers whose behaviour would not change.
- Decision
- Who should receive which useful intervention, including no treatment?
- Primary commercial metric
- Incremental retained contribution net of all extra treatment, service and system costs.
- Readiness
- Basic; uplift Advanced
- Agent role
- None required; no autonomous invented discounts or pricing.
Fit
A meaningful at-risk cohort has an addressable cause and an available, legitimate treatment.
The cause cannot be changed, required service must not be withheld, or an incentive merely conceals a persistent product failure.
Why it should work
Basic version
Prepare
Inputs
Audience or customer
Human role
Systems required
Guardrails
How to configure a Play
Copy the Play you need and complete only the relevant parts of T1–T5. Name the people responsible, define the customer group, agree economic and customer limits, and set a review date before starting. An empty decision threshold is not permission to act. Basic, Connected and Advanced describe how the work is configured; Experimental describes its evidence. AI is optional: compare each AI step with a simpler way of doing the same work.
Do the work
Intervention
Workflow
Verify risk and cause.
Separate mandatory service from optional treatment.
Compare alternatives and no action.
Approve economics and policy.
Assign eligible accounts.
Deliver and log.
Mature outcomes.
Review net treatment value and revise.
AI role
Automation role
Agent role
Failure modes
- Risk mistaken for preventability
- whole customer LTV booked as saved
- discount leakage
- extrapolated effect valued at pilot cost.
Measure and decide
Measurement
Primary commercial metric
Leading indicators
Experiment
Guardrails
Learn and progress
Learning
Curated next Play
Optional depth
Advanced versionPrerequisites: see Required maturity above.
Validated heterogeneous treatment models and bounded selection among proven treatments; test benefit over cohort rules.
Evidence for this Play4claims reviewed, with confidence ratings, limits and sources.
Claim classifications
Accepted means a principle or mechanism survived critical review, not that it guarantees a return. Accepted with conditions means prerequisites apply. Qualified means the original claim has been narrowed. Advanced needs substantial readiness. Experimental needs a capped comparison. Unresolved means the evidence cannot settle the claim. Rejected means the recommendation is excluded.
High, Medium and Low describe confidence in the stated target, not the chance of a positive ROI. For a Qualified or Rejected historical claim, confidence applies to the decision to narrow or reject it and to the supported limit—not to the original headline. Read the headline and classification together. An accounting identity or design principle is not empirical evidence of a commercial outcome. Follow the linked chapters, Plays and tools to see where each claim applies.