The GTM Growth System
How does the machinery work, and who decides?
The GTM Growth System
ModelM01ModelThe canonical model is Sense → Understand → Decide → Activate → Measure → Learn → Optimise. Each stage has a human owner or an owned service. A loop closes when outcomes inform a later decision; it does not require autonomous execution. sourcesSTR §7AI Augmented GTM Strategy — Commercial strategy; twelve principles and commercial loop.SYS §18AI Augmented GTM Systems Architecture — Systems architecture; proposed patterns, not an audited deployment.RT §§9,40AI Augmented GTM Red Team Verdict — Red Team; claim audit, investment challenge and simplification.Evidence for this chapter · 3 claim records
| Stage | What happens | Minimum evidence or output | Economic purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sense | Detect customer, market or operating change | Dated signal and source | Recognise an opportunity or avoidable loss |
| Understand | Check facts, needs and constraints | Diagnosis, alternatives and uncertainty | Avoid solving the wrong problem |
| Decide | Select a feasible action or no change | Named owner, rationale, limits | Allocate money and capacity |
| Activate | Deliver the approved intervention | Action version, delivery or receipt | Change a customer outcome or work cost |
| Measure | Compare outcomes and reconcile expense | Scoped estimate and guardrails | Determine commercial consequence |
| Learn | Adjudicate what is reusable | Finding, limits, owner and review trigger | Reduce repeat error and investigation |
| Optimise | Repeat, revise, expand or stop | Next decision and revised Play | Improve subsequent economics |
Different decisions use different clocks. A stock or contact-permission check may be time critical. Cohort review may be monthly; positioning changes less often. Faster cycling can contaminate experiments and overreact to noise. Use the required decision latency, not “real time” as a general aspiration.
Text version
Each stage has a human owner or an owned service.
- Sense — What happens: Detect customer, market or operating change. Minimum evidence or output: Dated signal and source.
- Understand — What happens: Check facts, needs and constraints. Minimum evidence or output: Diagnosis, alternatives and uncertainty.
- Decide — What happens: Select a feasible action or no change. Minimum evidence or output: Named owner, rationale, limits.
- Activate — What happens: Deliver the approved intervention. Minimum evidence or output: Action version, delivery or receipt.
- Measure — What happens: Compare outcomes and reconcile expense. Minimum evidence or output: Scoped estimate and guardrails.
- Learn — What happens: Adjudicate what is reusable. Minimum evidence or output: Finding, limits, owner and review trigger.
- Optimise — What happens: Repeat, revise, expand or stop. Minimum evidence or output: Next decision and revised Play.
- A loop closes when outcomes inform a later decision; it does not require autonomous execution.
Seven logical responsibilities; not seven products. Use this model with the conditions and limits described above.
Decisions and methods
| Decision | Evidence | Human owner | Method and AI role | Action and measurement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which market or proposition? | Customer needs, demand, competition, delivery and economics | GTM/Product leader | Human judgement; optional source synthesis | Approved proposition or market test; contribution and strategic coverage |
| Which customer intervention? | Eligibility, need, service history, treatment evidence | Lifecycle/Service owner | Rules first; validated models if useful | Repair, guidance, offer or no contact; net assigned-population contribution |
| Which acquisition signal? | Cohort value and outcome quality | Performance owner with Finance | Deterministic joins; optional calibrated prediction | Native value feed; incremental cohort contribution |
| How much investment? | Tranche effects, costs, constraints and uncertainty | Budget owner with required Finance authority | Scenario calculation; optional narrative support | Feasible transfer; portfolio contribution and cash |
| Should we scale or stop? | Mature readout and full operating cost | Accountable commercial owner | Independent method review; AI may explain signed results | Replicate, revise or close; subsequent observed outcomes |
Use the Rule / Model / AI / Agent / Human router. Rules handle exact criteria and repeatable calculations. Statistical models estimate risks or outcomes and must be validated. Generative AI interprets unstructured context and drafts inspectable work. An agent selects permitted next steps and tools dynamically; it needs a separate advantage over a fixed workflow. Humans retain ambiguous and consequential judgement. These are choices within a task, not a maturity ladder. sourcesSYS §8AI Augmented GTM Systems Architecture — Systems architecture; proposed patterns, not an audited deployment.AGT §§1–5AI Agent and Automation Operating Architecture — Automation architecture; explicitly no proven commercial agent result.Evidence for this chapter · 3 claim records
The operating records are deliberately small: T1 intervention and investment card; T2 economics and benefits ledger; T3 decision, experiment and evidence record; T4 action authority and operating contract; T5 delivery and retirement plan. Use existing systems or linked sections of one document. Do not create five new applications.
Related
Evidence for this chapter3claims reviewed, with confidence ratings, limits and sources.
Claim classifications
Accepted means a principle or mechanism survived critical review, not that it guarantees a return. Accepted with conditions means prerequisites apply. Qualified means the original claim has been narrowed. Advanced needs substantial readiness. Experimental needs a capped comparison. Unresolved means the evidence cannot settle the claim. Rejected means the recommendation is excluded.
High, Medium and Low describe confidence in the stated target, not the chance of a positive ROI. For a Qualified or Rejected historical claim, confidence applies to the decision to narrow or reject it and to the supported limit—not to the original headline. Read the headline and classification together. An accounting identity or design principle is not empirical evidence of a commercial outcome. Follow the linked chapters, Plays and tools to see where each claim applies.